(Photo : Pixabay)
Trump

In the escalating policy battle ahead of the November election, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump are presenting starkly different visions on tax policy and economic strategy, setting the stage for a pivotal debate that could shape the nation's financial landscape.

Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, announced on Monday a proposal to raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, a move her campaign frames as a step toward economic fairness and fiscal responsibility. "This is about putting money back in the pockets of working people and ensuring that billionaires and big corporations pay their fair share," said James Singer, a spokesperson for the Harris campaign. The plan, which echoes President Joe Biden's fiscal philosophy, aims to address income inequality while reducing the U.S. deficit by an estimated $1 trillion over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

This proposal represents a significant shift from the tax policies enacted under Trump's presidency, where the corporate tax rate was slashed from 35% to 21% as part of a broader package of tax cuts. Trump, who is seeking a return to the White House, has vowed to make those cuts permanent if elected, positioning himself as the candidate of low taxes and deregulation. His administration's tax cuts, set to expire next year, were aimed at stimulating business investment and economic growth, but they have been criticized by Democrats for disproportionately benefiting the wealthy and increasing the federal deficit.

Harris's proposal to raise the corporate tax rate is part of a broader economic agenda she outlined last week, which includes tax cuts for most Americans, measures to combat price gouging, and initiatives to build affordable housing. She has pledged to uphold Biden's promise not to raise taxes on individuals earning $400,000 or less annually, focusing instead on wealthier Americans and large corporations to fund her policies.

On the other side, Trump has continued to advocate for a business-friendly approach, emphasizing the importance of maintaining and expanding tax incentives for companies. In a campaign event on Monday, Trump indicated he would consider ending the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicle (EV) purchases, a policy he attempted to repeal during his presidency before it was expanded under Biden in 2022. Trump's skepticism toward tax credits and his preference for a market-driven economy were clear as he argued that such incentives are "not generally a very good thing."

Trump's remarks also signaled his willingness to re-engage with corporate America, expressing openness to naming Tesla CEO Elon Musk to a cabinet or advisory role if elected. Praising Musk as a "brilliant guy," Trump suggested that the tech entrepreneur could play a significant role in his administration, should Musk accept.

In contrast to Harris's focus on equitable taxation and deficit reduction, Trump's economic vision includes rolling back Biden administration regulations on automakers, particularly those related to electric vehicles and emissions standards. Trump suggested that the EV market may not expand as rapidly as some predict, citing concerns about cost and battery range, and proposed tariffs on vehicles imported from Mexico to encourage domestic production-a stance reminiscent of his previous trade policies.

As both candidates outline their tax and economic strategies, control of Congress remains a critical factor. Any changes to the U.S. tax code will require Congressional approval, and the upcoming election will determine whether Democrats or Republicans hold the power to advance their respective agendas.

This clash of economic philosophies underscores the broader ideological divide between Harris and Trump, with Harris advocating for a progressive tax system aimed at reducing inequality and Trump championing policies that prioritize corporate growth and deregulation. The outcome of this election could significantly influence the direction of U.S. fiscal policy for years to come.